Skip to content

T1033 System Owner/User Discovery

Adversaries may attempt to identify the primary user, currently logged in user, set of users that commonly uses a system, or whether a user is actively using the system. They may do this, for example, by retrieving account usernames or by using OS Credential Dumping. The information may be collected in a number of different ways using other Discovery techniques, because user and username details are prevalent throughout a system and include running process ownership, file/directory ownership, session information, and system logs. Adversaries may use the information from System Owner/User Discovery during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including whether or not the adversary fully infects the target and/or attempts specific actions.

Various utilities and commands may acquire this information, including whoami. In macOS and Linux, the currently logged in user can be identified with w and who. On macOS the dscl . list /Users | grep -v ‘_’ command can also be used to enumerate user accounts. Environment variables, such as %USERNAME% and $USER, may also be used to access this information.

Item Value
ID T1033
Sub-techniques
Tactics TA0007
CAPEC ID CAPEC-577
Platforms Linux, Windows, macOS
Version 1.3
Created 31 May 2017
Last Modified 20 April 2022

Procedure Examples

ID Name Description
S0331 Agent Tesla Agent Tesla can collect the username from the victim’s machine.313233
S0092 Agent.btz Agent.btz obtains the victim username and saves it to a file.35
G0073 APT19 APT19 used an HTTP malware variant and a Port 22 malware variant to collect the victim’s username.173
G0022 APT3 An APT3 downloader uses the Windows command “cmd.exe” /C whoami to verify that it is running with the elevated privileges of “System.”158
G0050 APT32 APT32 collected the victim’s username and executed the whoami command on the victim’s machine. APT32 executed shellcode to collect the username on the victim’s machine. 15115216
G0067 APT37 APT37 identifies the victim username.146
G0082 APT38 APT38 has identified primary users, currently logged in users, sets of users that commonly use a system, or inactive users.170
G0087 APT39 APT39 used Remexi to collect usernames from the system.150
G0096 APT41 APT41 used the WMIEXEC utility to execute whoami commands on remote machines.143
S0456 Aria-body Aria-body has the ability to identify the username on a compromised host.131
S0344 Azorult Azorult can collect the username from the victim’s machine.39
S0414 BabyShark BabyShark has executed the whoami command.101
S0093 Backdoor.Oldrea Backdoor.Oldrea collects the current username from the victim.85
S0534 Bazar Bazar can identify the username of the infected user.46
S0017 BISCUIT BISCUIT has a command to gather the username from the system.94
S0521 BloodHound BloodHound can collect information on user sessions.6
S0657 BLUELIGHT BLUELIGHT can collect the username on a compromised host.136
S0486 Bonadan Bonadan has discovered the username of the user running the backdoor.10
S0635 BoomBox BoomBox can enumerate the username on a compromised host.104
S0351 Cannon Cannon can gather the username from the system.89
S0348 Cardinal RAT Cardinal RAT can collect the username from a victim machine.44
S0572 Caterpillar WebShell Caterpillar WebShell can obtain a list of user accounts from a victim’s machine.118
S0631 Chaes Chaes has collected the username and UID from the infected machine.130
G0114 Chimera Chimera has used the quser command to show currently logged on users.147
S0667 Chrommme Chrommme can retrieve the username from a targeted system.88
S0660 Clambling Clambling can identify the username on a compromised host.8283
S0115 Crimson Crimson can identify the user on a targeted system.4041
S0498 Cryptoistic Cryptoistic can gather data on the user of a compromised host.121
S0334 DarkComet DarkComet gathers the username from the victim’s machine.9
S0673 DarkWatchman DarkWatchman has collected the username from a victim machine.77
S0354 Denis Denis enumerates and collects the username from the victim’s machine.1516
S0021 Derusbi A Linux version of Derusbi checks if the victim user ID is anything other than zero (normally used for root), and the malware will not execute if it does not have root privileges. Derusbi also gathers the username of the victim.117
S0659 Diavol Diavol can collect the username from a compromised host.54
S0186 DownPaper DownPaper collects the victim username and sends it to the C2 server.137
G0035 Dragonfly Dragonfly used the command query user on victim hosts.156
S0694 DRATzarus DRATzarus can obtain a list of users from an infected machine.58
S0024 Dyre Dyre has the ability to identify the users on a compromised host.26
S0554 Egregor Egregor has used tools to gather information about users.105
S0091 Epic Epic collects the user name from the victim’s machine.133
S0568 EVILNUM EVILNUM can obtain the username from the victim’s machine.127
S0401 Exaramel for Linux Exaramel for Linux can run whoami to identify the system owner.107
S0569 Explosive Explosive has collected the username from the infected host.62
S0171 Felismus Felismus collects the current username and sends it to the C2 server.128
S0267 FELIXROOT FELIXROOT collects the username from the victim’s machine.8081
G0051 FIN10 FIN10 has used Meterpreter to enumerate users on remote systems.155
S0696 Flagpro Flagpro has been used to run the whoami command on the system.45
S0381 FlawedAmmyy FlawedAmmyy enumerates the current user during the initial infection.55
G0101 Frankenstein Frankenstein has enumerated hosts, gathering username, machine name, and administrative permissions information.142
G0093 GALLIUM GALLIUM used whoami and query user to obtain information about the victim user.141
G0047 Gamaredon Group A Gamaredon Group file stealer can gather the victim’s username to send to a C2 server.145
S0168 Gazer Gazer obtains the current user’s security identifier.102
S0666 Gelsemium Gelsemium has the ability to distinguish between a standard user and an administrator on a compromised host.88
S0460 Get2 Get2 has the ability to identify the current username of an infected host.78
S0249 Gold Dragon Gold Dragon collects the endpoint victim’s username and uses it as a basis for downloading additional components from the C2 server.37
S0477 Goopy Goopy has the ability to enumerate the infected system’s user name.16
S0531 Grandoreiro Grandoreiro can collect the username from the victim’s machine.111
S0237 GravityRAT GravityRAT collects the victim username along with other account information (account type, description, full name, SID and status).69
S0632 GrimAgent GrimAgent can identify the user id on a target machine.74
S0214 HAPPYWORK can collect the victim user name.84
S0391 HAWKBALL HAWKBALL can collect the user name of the system.125
S0431 HotCroissant HotCroissant has the ability to collect the username on the infected host.53
S0260 InvisiMole InvisiMole lists local users and session information.92
S0015 Ixeshe Ixeshe collects the username from the victim’s machine.18
S0201 JPIN JPIN can obtain the victim user name.129
S0265 Kazuar Kazuar gathers information on users.30
G0004 Ke3chang Ke3chang has used implants capable of collecting the signed-in username.112
S0250 Koadic Koadic can identify logged in users across the domain and views user sessions.54
S0162 Komplex The OsInfo function in Komplex collects the current running username.108
S0356 KONNI KONNI can collect the username from the victim’s machine.76
S0236 Kwampirs Kwampirs collects registered owner details by using the commands systeminfo and net config workstation.28
G0032 Lazarus Group Various Lazarus Group malware enumerates logged-on users.159160161162163121164
S0362 Linux Rabbit Linux Rabbit opens a socket on port 22 and if it receives a response it attempts to obtain the machine’s hostname and Top-Level Domain. 106
S0513 LiteDuke LiteDuke can enumerate the account name on a targeted system.27
S0680 LitePower LitePower can determine if the current user has admin privileges.73
S0681 Lizar Lizar can collect the username from the system.24
S0447 Lokibot Lokibot has the ability to discover the username on the infected host.110
S0532 Lucifer Lucifer has the ability to identify the username on a compromised host.52
G0059 Magic Hound Magic Hound malware has obtained the victim username and sent it to the C2 server.148
S0652 MarkiRAT MarkiRAT can retrieve the victim’s username.17
S0459 MechaFlounder MechaFlounder has the ability to identify the username and hostname on a compromised host.139
S0455 Metamorfo Metamorfo has collected the username from the victim’s machine.79
S0339 Micropsia Micropsia collects the username from the victim’s machine.23
S0280 MirageFox MirageFox can gather the username from the victim’s machine.8
S0084 Mis-Type Mis-Type runs tests to determine the privilege level of the compromised user.95
S0149 MoonWind MoonWind obtains the victim username.138
S0284 More_eggs More_eggs has the capability to gather the username from the victim’s machine.123124
S0256 Mosquito Mosquito runs whoami on the victim’s machine.47
G0069 MuddyWater MuddyWater has used malware that can collect the victim’s username.153154
S0228 NanHaiShu NanHaiShu collects the username from the victim.50
S0590 NBTscan NBTscan can list active users on the system.12
S0272 NDiskMonitor NDiskMonitor obtains the victim username and encrypts the information to send over its C2 channel.59
S0691 Neoichor Neoichor can collect the user name from a victim’s machine.112
S0385 njRAT njRAT enumerates the current user during the initial infection.90
S0353 NOKKI NOKKI can collect the username from the victim’s machine.34
S0644 ObliqueRAT ObliqueRAT can check for blocklisted usernames on infected endpoints.22
S0340 Octopus Octopus can collect the username from the victim’s machine.135
G0049 OilRig OilRig has run whoami on a victim.165166103
S0439 Okrum Okrum can collect the victim username.99
G0116 Operation Wocao Operation Wocao has enumerated sessions and users on a remote host, and identified privileged users logged into a targeted system.149
G0040 Patchwork Patchwork collected the victim username and whether it was running as admin, then sent the information to its C2 server.16759
S0428 PoetRAT PoetRAT sent username, computer name, and the previously generated UUID in reply to a “who” command from C2.63
S0139 PowerDuke PowerDuke has commands to get the current user’s name and SID.66
S0441 PowerShower PowerShower has the ability to identify the current user on the infected host.96
S0223 POWERSTATS POWERSTATS has the ability to identify the username on the compromised host.11
S0184 POWRUNER POWRUNER may collect information about the currently logged in user by running whoami on a victim.70
S0113 Prikormka A module in Prikormka collects information from the victim about the current user name.122
S0192 Pupy Pupy can enumerate local information for Linux hosts and find currently logged on users for Windows hosts.3
S0650 QakBot QakBot can identify the user name on a compromised system.97
S0269 QUADAGENT QUADAGENT gathers the victim username.64
S0241 RATANKBA RATANKBA runs the whoami and query user commands.36
S0662 RCSession RCSession can gather system owner information, including user and administrator privileges.98
S0172 Reaver Reaver collects the victim’s username.100
S0153 RedLeaves RedLeaves can obtain information about the logged on user both locally and for Remote Desktop sessions.93
S0125 Remsec Remsec can obtain information about the current user.68
S0379 Revenge RAT Revenge RAT gathers the username from the system.87
S0258 RGDoor RGDoor executes the whoami on the victim’s machine.113
S0433 Rifdoor Rifdoor has the ability to identify the username on the compromised host.53
S0448 Rising Sun Rising Sun can detect the username of the infected host.60
S0270 RogueRobin RogueRobin collects the victim’s username and whether that user is an admin.120
S0240 ROKRAT ROKRAT can collect the username from a compromised host.126
S0148 RTM RTM can obtain the victim username and permissions.75
G0034 Sandworm Team Sandworm Team has collected the username from a compromised host.171
S0461 SDBbot SDBbot has the ability to identify the user on a compromised host.78
S0382 ServHelper ServHelper will attempt to enumerate the username of the victim.43
S0596 ShadowPad ShadowPad has collected the username of the victim system.49
S0450 SHARPSTATS SHARPSTATS has the ability to identify the username on the compromised host.11
S0610 SideTwist SideTwist can collect the username on a targeted system.103
G0121 Sidewinder Sidewinder has used tools to identify the user of a compromised host.169
S0692 SILENTTRINITY SILENTTRINITY can gather a list of logged on users.7
S0533 SLOTHFULMEDIA SLOTHFULMEDIA has collected the username from a victim machine.115
S0649 SMOKEDHAM SMOKEDHAM has used whoami commands to identify system owners.51
S0627 SodaMaster SodaMaster can identify the username on a compromised host.25
S0615 SombRAT SombRAT can execute getinfo to identify the username on a compromised host.7172
S0543 Spark Spark has run the whoami command and has a built-in command to identify the user logged in.38
S0374 SpeakUp SpeakUp uses the whoami command. 91
S0058 SslMM SslMM sends the logged-on username to its hard-coded C2.42
G0038 Stealth Falcon Stealth Falcon malware gathers the registered user and primary owner name via WMI.157
S0559 SUNBURST SUNBURST collected the username from a compromised host.1314
S0242 SynAck SynAck gathers user names from infected hosts.114
S0060 Sys10 Sys10 collects the account name of the logged-in user and sends it to the C2.42
S0098 T9000 T9000 gathers and beacons the username of the logged in account during installation. It will also gather the username of running processes to determine if it is running as SYSTEM.132
G0027 Threat Group-3390 Threat Group-3390 has used whoami to collect system user information.82
S0266 TrickBot TrickBot can identify the user and groups the user belongs to on a compromised host.65
S0094 Trojan.Karagany Trojan.Karagany can gather information about the user on a compromised host.12
G0081 Tropic Trooper Tropic Trooper used letmein to scan for saved usernames on the target system.144
S0647 Turian Turian can retrieve usernames.20
S0130 Unknown Logger Unknown Logger can obtain information about the victim usernames.19
S0275 UPPERCUT UPPERCUT has the capability to collect the current logged on user’s username from a machine.109
S0476 Valak Valak can gather information regarding the user.21
S0257 VERMIN VERMIN gathers the username from the victim’s machine.61
S0515 WellMail WellMail can identify the current username on the victim system.119
S0514 WellMess WellMess can collect the username on the victim machine to send to C2.134
S0155 WINDSHIELD WINDSHIELD can gather the victim user name.29
G0112 Windshift Windshift has used malware to identify the username on a compromised host.172
S0219 WINERACK WINERACK can gather information on the victim username.84
S0059 WinMM WinMM uses NetUser-GetInfo to identify that it is running under an “Admin” account on the local system.42
G0102 Wizard Spider Wizard Spider has used “whoami” to identify the local user and their privileges.140
S0161 XAgentOSX XAgentOSX contains the getInfoOSX function to return the OS X version as well as the current user.67
S0248 yty yty collects the victim’s username.116
S0251 Zebrocy Zebrocy gets the username from the system.5657
G0128 ZIRCONIUM ZIRCONIUM has used a tool to capture the username on a compromised host in order to register it with C2.168
S0350 zwShell zwShell can obtain the name of the logged-in user on the victim.48
S0412 ZxShell ZxShell can collect the owner and organization information from the target workstation.86

Detection

ID Data Source Data Component
DS0026 Active Directory Active Directory Object Access
DS0017 Command Command Execution
DS0022 File File Access
DS0029 Network Traffic Network Traffic Content
DS0009 Process OS API Execution
DS0024 Windows Registry Windows Registry Key Access

References

  1. Bezroutchko, A. (2019, November 19). NBTscan man page. Retrieved March 17, 2021. ↩

  2. SecTools. (2003, June 11). NBTscan. Retrieved March 17, 2021. ↩

  3. Nicolas Verdier. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2018. ↩

  4. Jazi, H. (2021, February). LazyScripter: From Empire to double RAT. Retrieved November 24, 2021. ↩

  5. Magius, J., et al. (2017, July 19). Koadic. Retrieved June 18, 2018. ↩

  6. Red Team Labs. (2018, April 24). Hidden Administrative Accounts: BloodHound to the Rescue. Retrieved October 28, 2020. ↩

  7. Salvati, M. (2019, August 6). SILENTTRINITY Modules. Retrieved March 24, 2022. ↩

  8. Rosenberg, J. (2018, June 14). MirageFox: APT15 Resurfaces With New Tools Based On Old Ones. Retrieved September 21, 2018. ↩

  9. TrendMicro. (2014, September 03). DARKCOMET. Retrieved November 6, 2018. ↩

  10. Dumont, R., M.Léveillé, M., Porcher, H. (2018, December 1). THE DARK SIDE OF THE FORSSHE A landscape of OpenSSH backdoors. Retrieved July 16, 2020. ↩

  11. Lunghi, D. and Horejsi, J.. (2019, June 10). MuddyWater Resurfaces, Uses Multi-Stage Backdoor POWERSTATS V3 and New Post-Exploitation Tools. Retrieved May 14, 2020. ↩↩

  12. Secureworks. (2019, July 24). Updated Karagany Malware Targets Energy Sector. Retrieved August 12, 2020. ↩

  13. FireEye. (2020, December 13). Highly Evasive Attacker Leverages SolarWinds Supply Chain to Compromise Multiple Global Victims With SUNBURST Backdoor. Retrieved January 4, 2021. ↩

  14. MSTIC. (2020, December 18). Analyzing Solorigate, the compromised DLL file that started a sophisticated cyberattack, and how Microsoft Defender helps protect customers . Retrieved January 5, 2021. ↩

  15. Shulmin, A., Yunakovsky, S. (2017, April 28). Use of DNS Tunneling for C&C Communications. Retrieved November 5, 2018. ↩

  16. Dahan, A. (2017). Operation Cobalt Kitty. Retrieved December 27, 2018. ↩↩↩

  17. GReAT. (2021, June 16). Ferocious Kitten: 6 Years of Covert Surveillance in Iran. Retrieved September 22, 2021. ↩

  18. Sancho, D., et al. (2012, May 22). IXESHE An APT Campaign. Retrieved June 7, 2019. ↩

  19. Settle, A., et al. (2016, August 8). MONSOON - Analysis Of An APT Campaign. Retrieved September 22, 2016. ↩

  20. Adam Burgher. (2021, June 10). BackdoorDiplomacy: Upgrading from Quarian to Turian. Retrieved September 1, 2021 ↩

  21. Salem, E. et al. (2020, May 28). VALAK: MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE . Retrieved June 19, 2020. ↩

  22. Malhotra, A. (2021, March 2). ObliqueRAT returns with new campaign using hijacked websites. Retrieved September 2, 2021. ↩

  23. Rascagneres, P., Mercer, W. (2017, June 19). Delphi Used To Score Against Palestine. Retrieved November 13, 2018. ↩

  24. BI.ZONE Cyber Threats Research Team. (2021, May 13). From pentest to APT attack: cybercriminal group FIN7 disguises its malware as an ethical hacker’s toolkit. Retrieved February 2, 2022. ↩

  25. GREAT. (2021, March 30). APT10: sophisticated multi-layered loader Ecipekac discovered in A41APT campaign. Retrieved June 17, 2021. ↩

  26. hasherezade. (2015, November 4). A Technical Look At Dyreza. Retrieved June 15, 2020. ↩

  27. Faou, M., Tartare, M., Dupuy, T. (2019, October). OPERATION GHOST. Retrieved September 23, 2020. ↩

  28. Symantec Security Response Attack Investigation Team. (2018, April 23). New Orangeworm attack group targets the healthcare sector in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Retrieved May 8, 2018. ↩

  29. Carr, N.. (2017, May 14). Cyber Espionage is Alive and Well: APT32 and the Threat to Global Corporations. Retrieved June 18, 2017. ↩

  30. Levene, B, et al. (2017, May 03). Kazuar: Multiplatform Espionage Backdoor with API Access. Retrieved July 17, 2018. ↩

  31. The DigiTrust Group. (2017, January 12). The Rise of Agent Tesla. Retrieved November 5, 2018. ↩

  32. Zhang, X. (2018, April 05). Analysis of New Agent Tesla Spyware Variant. Retrieved November 5, 2018. ↩

  33. Jazi, H. (2020, April 16). New AgentTesla variant steals WiFi credentials. Retrieved May 19, 2020. ↩

  34. Grunzweig, J., Lee, B. (2018, September 27). New KONNI Malware attacking Eurasia and Southeast Asia. Retrieved November 5, 2018. ↩

  35. Shevchenko, S.. (2008, November 30). Agent.btz - A Threat That Hit Pentagon. Retrieved April 8, 2016. ↩

  36. Trend Micro. (2017, February 27). RATANKBA: Delving into Large-scale Watering Holes against Enterprises. Retrieved May 22, 2018. ↩

  37. Sherstobitoff, R., Saavedra-Morales, J. (2018, February 02). Gold Dragon Widens Olympics Malware Attacks, Gains Permanent Presence on Victims’ Systems. Retrieved June 6, 2018. ↩

  38. Falcone, R., et al. (2020, March 3). Molerats Delivers Spark Backdoor to Government and Telecommunications Organizations. Retrieved December 14, 2020. ↩

  39. Yan, T., et al. (2018, November 21). New Wine in Old Bottle: New Azorult Variant Found in FindMyName Campaign using Fallout Exploit Kit. Retrieved November 29, 2018. ↩

  40. Huss, D. (2016, March 1). Operation Transparent Tribe. Retrieved June 8, 2016. ↩

  41. Dedola, G. (2020, August 20). Transparent Tribe: Evolution analysis, part 1. Retrieved September 2, 2021. ↩

  42. Baumgartner, K., Golovkin, M.. (2015, May). The MsnMM Campaigns: The Earliest Naikon APT Campaigns. Retrieved April 10, 2019. ↩↩↩

  43. Schwarz, D. and Proofpoint Staff. (2019, January 9). ServHelper and FlawedGrace - New malware introduced by TA505. Retrieved May 28, 2019. ↩

  44. Grunzweig, J.. (2017, April 20). Cardinal RAT Active for Over Two Years. Retrieved December 8, 2018. ↩

  45. Hada, H. (2021, December 28). Flagpro The new malware used by BlackTech. Retrieved March 25, 2022. ↩

  46. Pantazopoulos, N. (2020, June 2). In-depth analysis of the new Team9 malware family. Retrieved December 1, 2020. ↩

  47. ESET, et al. (2018, January). Diplomats in Eastern Europe bitten by a Turla mosquito. Retrieved July 3, 2018. ↩

  48. McAfee® Foundstone® Professional Services and McAfee Labs™. (2011, February 10). Global Energy Cyberattacks: “Night Dragon”. Retrieved February 19, 2018. ↩

  49. Kaspersky Lab. (2017, August). ShadowPad: popular server management software hit in supply chain attack. Retrieved March 22, 2021. ↩

  50. F-Secure Labs. (2016, July). NANHAISHU RATing the South China Sea. Retrieved July 6, 2018. ↩

  51. FireEye. (2021, June 16). Smoking Out a DARKSIDE Affiliate’s Supply Chain Software Compromise. Retrieved September 22, 2021. ↩

  52. Hsu, K. et al. (2020, June 24). Lucifer: New Cryptojacking and DDoS Hybrid Malware Exploiting High and Critical Vulnerabilities to Infect Windows Devices. Retrieved November 16, 2020. ↩

  53. Knight, S.. (2020, April 16). VMware Carbon Black TAU Threat Analysis: The Evolution of Lazarus. Retrieved May 1, 2020. ↩↩

  54. Neeamni, D., Rubinfeld, A.. (2021, July 1). Diavol - A New Ransomware Used By Wizard Spider?. Retrieved November 12, 2021. ↩

  55. Proofpoint Staff. (2018, March 7). Leaked Ammyy Admin Source Code Turned into Malware. Retrieved May 28, 2019. ↩

  56. ESET. (2018, November 20). Sednit: What’s going on with Zebrocy?. Retrieved February 12, 2019. ↩

  57. CISA. (2020, October 29). Malware Analysis Report (AR20-303B). Retrieved December 9, 2020. ↩

  58. ClearSky Research Team. (2020, August 13). Operation ‘Dream Job’ Widespread North Korean Espionage Campaign. Retrieved December 20, 2021. ↩

  59. Lunghi, D., et al. (2017, December). Untangling the Patchwork Cyberespionage Group. Retrieved July 10, 2018. ↩↩

  60. Sherstobitoff, R., Malhotra, A., et. al.. (2018, December 18). Operation Sharpshooter Campaign Targets Global Defense, Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved May 14, 2020. ↩

  61. Lancaster, T., Cortes, J. (2018, January 29). VERMIN: Quasar RAT and Custom Malware Used In Ukraine. Retrieved July 5, 2018. ↩

  62. Threat Intelligence and Research. (2015, March 30). VOLATILE CEDAR. Retrieved February 8, 2021. ↩

  63. Mercer, W, et al. (2020, April 16). PoetRAT: Python RAT uses COVID-19 lures to target Azerbaijan public and private sectors. Retrieved April 27, 2020. ↩

  64. Lee, B., Falcone, R. (2018, July 25). OilRig Targets Technology Service Provider and Government Agency with QUADAGENT. Retrieved August 9, 2018. ↩

  65. Dahan, A. et al. (2019, December 11). DROPPING ANCHOR: FROM A TRICKBOT INFECTION TO THE DISCOVERY OF THE ANCHOR MALWARE. Retrieved September 10, 2020. ↩

  66. Adair, S.. (2016, November 9). PowerDuke: Widespread Post-Election Spear Phishing Campaigns Targeting Think Tanks and NGOs. Retrieved January 11, 2017. ↩

  67. Robert Falcone. (2017, February 14). XAgentOSX: Sofacy’s Xagent macOS Tool. Retrieved July 12, 2017. ↩

  68. Kaspersky Lab’s Global Research & Analysis Team. (2016, August 9). The ProjectSauron APT. Technical Analysis. Retrieved August 17, 2016. ↩

  69. Mercer, W., Rascagneres, P. (2018, April 26). GravityRAT - The Two-Year Evolution Of An APT Targeting India. Retrieved May 16, 2018. ↩

  70. Sardiwal, M, et al. (2017, December 7). New Targeted Attack in the Middle East by APT34, a Suspected Iranian Threat Group, Using CVE-2017-11882 Exploit. Retrieved December 20, 2017. ↩

  71. The BlackBerry Research and Intelligence Team. (2020, November 12). The CostaRicto Campaign: Cyber-Espionage Outsourced. Retrieved May 24, 2021. ↩

  72. CISA. (2021, May 6). Analysis Report (AR21-126A) FiveHands Ransomware. Retrieved June 7, 2021. ↩

  73. Yamout, M. (2021, November 29). WIRTE’s campaign in the Middle East ‘living off the land’ since at least 2019. Retrieved February 1, 2022. ↩

  74. Priego, A. (2021, July). THE BROTHERS GRIM: THE REVERSING TALE OF GRIMAGENT MALWARE USED BY RYUK. Retrieved July 16, 2021. ↩

  75. Faou, M. and Boutin, J. (2017, February). Read The Manual: A Guide to the RTM Banking Trojan. Retrieved March 9, 2017. ↩

  76. Rascagneres, P. (2017, May 03). KONNI: A Malware Under The Radar For Years. Retrieved November 5, 2018. ↩

  77. Smith, S., Stafford, M. (2021, December 14). DarkWatchman: A new evolution in fileless techniques. Retrieved January 10, 2022. ↩

  78. Schwarz, D. et al. (2019, October 16). TA505 Distributes New SDBbot Remote Access Trojan with Get2 Downloader. Retrieved May 29, 2020. ↩↩

  79. ESET Research. (2019, October 3). Casbaneiro: peculiarities of this banking Trojan that affects Brazil and Mexico. Retrieved September 23, 2021. ↩

  80. Patil, S. (2018, June 26). Microsoft Office Vulnerabilities Used to Distribute FELIXROOT Backdoor in Recent Campaign. Retrieved July 31, 2018. ↩

  81. Cherepanov, A. (2018, October). GREYENERGY A successor to BlackEnergy. Retrieved November 15, 2018. ↩

  82. Lunghi, D. et al. (2020, February). Uncovering DRBControl. Retrieved November 12, 2021. ↩↩

  83. Chen, T. and Chen, Z. (2020, February 17). CLAMBLING - A New Backdoor Base On Dropbox. Retrieved November 12, 2021. ↩

  84. FireEye. (2018, February 20). APT37 (Reaper): The Overlooked North Korean Actor. Retrieved March 1, 2018. ↩↩

  85. Symantec Security Response. (2014, July 7). Dragonfly: Cyberespionage Attacks Against Energy Suppliers. Retrieved April 8, 2016. ↩

  86. Allievi, A., et al. (2014, October 28). Threat Spotlight: Group 72, Opening the ZxShell. Retrieved September 24, 2019. ↩

  87. Livelli, K, et al. (2018, November 12). Operation Shaheen. Retrieved May 1, 2019. ↩

  88. Dupuy, T. and Faou, M. (2021, June). Gelsemium. Retrieved November 30, 2021. ↩↩

  89. Falcone, R., Lee, B. (2018, November 20). Sofacy Continues Global Attacks and Wheels Out New ‘Cannon’ Trojan. Retrieved November 26, 2018. ↩

  90. Fidelis Cybersecurity. (2013, June 28). Fidelis Threat Advisory #1009: “njRAT” Uncovered. Retrieved June 4, 2019. ↩

  91. Check Point Research. (2019, February 4). SpeakUp: A New Undetected Backdoor Linux Trojan. Retrieved April 17, 2019. ↩

  92. Hromcová, Z. (2018, June 07). InvisiMole: Surprisingly equipped spyware, undercover since 2013. Retrieved July 10, 2018. ↩

  93. PwC and BAE Systems. (2017, April). Operation Cloud Hopper: Technical Annex. Retrieved April 13, 2017. ↩

  94. Mandiant. (n.d.). Appendix C (Digital) - The Malware Arsenal. Retrieved July 18, 2016. ↩

  95. Gross, J. (2016, February 23). Operation Dust Storm. Retrieved December 22, 2021. ↩

  96. GReAT. (2019, August 12). Recent Cloud Atlas activity. Retrieved May 8, 2020. ↩

  97. Kuzmenko, A. et al. (2021, September 2). QakBot technical analysis. Retrieved September 27, 2021. ↩

  98. Global Threat Center, Intelligence Team. (2020, December). APT27 Turns to Ransomware. Retrieved November 12, 2021. ↩

  99. Hromcova, Z. (2019, July). OKRUM AND KETRICAN: AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT KE3CHANG GROUP ACTIVITY. Retrieved May 6, 2020. ↩

  100. Grunzweig, J. and Miller-Osborn, J. (2017, November 10). New Malware with Ties to SunOrcal Discovered. Retrieved November 16, 2017. ↩

  101. Unit 42. (2019, February 22). New BabyShark Malware Targets U.S. National Security Think Tanks. Retrieved October 7, 2019. ↩

  102. Kaspersky Lab’s Global Research & Analysis Team. (2017, August 30). Introducing WhiteBear. Retrieved September 21, 2017. ↩

  103. Check Point. (2021, April 8). Iran’s APT34 Returns with an Updated Arsenal. Retrieved May 5, 2021. ↩↩

  104. MSTIC. (2021, May 28). Breaking down NOBELIUM’s latest early-stage toolset. Retrieved August 4, 2021. ↩

  105. Bichet, J. (2020, November 12). Egregor – Prolock: Fraternal Twins ?. Retrieved January 6, 2021. ↩

  106. Anomali Labs. (2018, December 6). Pulling Linux Rabbit/Rabbot Malware Out of a Hat. Retrieved March 4, 2019. ↩

  107. ANSSI. (2021, January 27). SANDWORM INTRUSION SET CAMPAIGN TARGETING CENTREON SYSTEMS. Retrieved March 30, 2021. ↩

  108. Dani Creus, Tyler Halfpop, Robert Falcone. (2016, September 26). Sofacy’s ‘Komplex’ OS X Trojan. Retrieved July 8, 2017. ↩

  109. Matsuda, A., Muhammad I. (2018, September 13). APT10 Targeting Japanese Corporations Using Updated TTPs. Retrieved September 17, 2018. ↩

  110. Kazem, M. (2019, November 25). Trojan:W32/Lokibot. Retrieved May 15, 2020. ↩

  111. ESET. (2020, April 28). Grandoreiro: How engorged can an EXE get?. Retrieved November 13, 2020. ↩

  112. MSTIC. (2021, December 6). NICKEL targeting government organizations across Latin America and Europe. Retrieved March 18, 2022. ↩↩

  113. Falcone, R. (2018, January 25). OilRig uses RGDoor IIS Backdoor on Targets in the Middle East. Retrieved July 6, 2018. ↩

  114. Ivanov, A. et al. (2018, May 7). SynAck targeted ransomware uses the Doppelgänging technique. Retrieved May 22, 2018. ↩

  115. DHS/CISA, Cyber National Mission Force. (2020, October 1). Malware Analysis Report (MAR) MAR-10303705-1.v1 – Remote Access Trojan: SLOTHFULMEDIA. Retrieved October 2, 2020. ↩

  116. Schwarz, D., Sopko J. (2018, March 08). Donot Team Leverages New Modular Malware Framework in South Asia. Retrieved June 11, 2018. ↩

  117. Fidelis Cybersecurity. (2016, February 29). The Turbo Campaign, Featuring Derusbi for 64-bit Linux. Retrieved March 2, 2016. ↩

  118. ClearSky Cyber Security. (2021, January). “Lebanese Cedar” APT Global Lebanese Espionage Campaign Leveraging Web Servers. Retrieved February 10, 2021. ↩

  119. CISA. (2020, July 16). MAR-10296782-3.v1 – WELLMAIL. Retrieved September 29, 2020. ↩

  120. Falcone, R., et al. (2018, July 27). New Threat Actor Group DarkHydrus Targets Middle East Government. Retrieved August 2, 2018. ↩

  121. Stokes, P. (2020, July 27). Four Distinct Families of Lazarus Malware Target Apple’s macOS Platform. Retrieved August 7, 2020. ↩↩

  122. Cherepanov, A.. (2016, May 17). Operation Groundbait: Analysis of a surveillance toolkit. Retrieved May 18, 2016. ↩

  123. Svajcer, V. (2018, July 31). Multiple Cobalt Personality Disorder. Retrieved September 5, 2018. ↩

  124. Villadsen, O.. (2019, August 29). More_eggs, Anyone? Threat Actor ITG08 Strikes Again. Retrieved September 16, 2019. ↩

  125. Patil, S. and Williams, M.. (2019, June 5). Government Sector in Central Asia Targeted With New HAWKBALL Backdoor Delivered via Microsoft Office Vulnerabilities. Retrieved June 20, 2019. ↩

  126. Jazi, Hossein. (2021, January 6). Retrohunting APT37: North Korean APT used VBA self decode technique to inject RokRat. Retrieved March 22, 2022. ↩

  127. Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved December 22, 2021. ↩

  128. Somerville, L. and Toro, A. (2017, March 30). Playing Cat & Mouse: Introducing the Felismus Malware. Retrieved November 16, 2017. ↩

  129. Windows Defender Advanced Threat Hunting Team. (2016, April 29). PLATINUM: Targeted attacks in South and Southeast Asia. Retrieved February 15, 2018. ↩

  130. Salem, E. (2020, November 17). CHAES: Novel Malware Targeting Latin American E-Commerce. Retrieved June 30, 2021. ↩

  131. CheckPoint. (2020, May 7). Naikon APT: Cyber Espionage Reloaded. Retrieved May 26, 2020. ↩

  132. Grunzweig, J. and Miller-Osborn, J.. (2016, February 4). T9000: Advanced Modular Backdoor Uses Complex Anti-Analysis Techniques. Retrieved April 15, 2016. ↩

  133. Kaspersky Lab’s Global Research & Analysis Team. (2014, August 06). The Epic Turla Operation: Solving some of the mysteries of Snake/Uroboros. Retrieved November 7, 2018. ↩

  134. CISA. (2020, July 16). MAR-10296782-2.v1 – WELLMESS. Retrieved September 24, 2020. ↩

  135. Kaspersky Lab’s Global Research & Analysis Team. (2018, October 15). Octopus-infested seas of Central Asia. Retrieved November 14, 2018. ↩

  136. Cash, D., Grunzweig, J., Meltzer, M., Adair, S., Lancaster, T. (2021, August 17). North Korean APT InkySquid Infects Victims Using Browser Exploits. Retrieved September 30, 2021. ↩

  137. ClearSky Cyber Security. (2017, December). Charming Kitten. Retrieved December 27, 2017. ↩

  138. Miller-Osborn, J. and Grunzweig, J.. (2017, March 30). Trochilus and New MoonWind RATs Used In Attack Against Thai Organizations. Retrieved March 30, 2017. ↩

  139. Falcone, R. (2019, March 4). New Python-Based Payload MechaFlounder Used by Chafer. Retrieved May 27, 2020. ↩

  140. Sean Gallagher, Peter Mackenzie, Elida Leite, Syed Shahram, Bill Kearney, Anand Aijan, Sivagnanam Gn, Suraj Mundalik. (2020, October 14). They’re back: inside a new Ryuk ransomware attack. Retrieved October 14, 2020. ↩

  141. Cybereason Nocturnus. (2019, June 25). Operation Soft Cell: A Worldwide Campaign Against Telecommunications Providers. Retrieved July 18, 2019. ↩

  142. Adamitis, D. et al. (2019, June 4). It’s alive: Threat actors cobble together open-source pieces into monstrous Frankenstein campaign. Retrieved May 11, 2020. ↩

  143. Fraser, N., et al. (2019, August 7). Double DragonAPT41, a dual espionage and cyber crime operation APT41. Retrieved September 23, 2019. ↩

  144. Alintanahin, K. (2015). Operation Tropic Trooper: Relying on Tried-and-Tested Flaws to Infiltrate Secret Keepers. Retrieved June 14, 2019. ↩

  145. Kasza, A. and Reichel, D. (2017, February 27). The Gamaredon Group Toolset Evolution. Retrieved March 1, 2017. ↩

  146. Mercer, W., Rascagneres, P. (2018, January 16). Korea In The Crosshairs. Retrieved May 21, 2018. ↩

  147. Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved January 19, 2021. ↩

  148. Lee, B. and Falcone, R. (2017, February 15). Magic Hound Campaign Attacks Saudi Targets. Retrieved December 27, 2017. ↩

  149. Dantzig, M. v., Schamper, E. (2019, December 19). Operation Wocao: Shining a light on one of China’s hidden hacking groups. Retrieved October 8, 2020. ↩

  150. Symantec Security Response. (2015, December 7). Iran-based attackers use back door threats to spy on Middle Eastern targets. Retrieved April 17, 2019. ↩

  151. Henderson, S., et al. (2020, April 22). Vietnamese Threat Actors APT32 Targeting Wuhan Government and Chinese Ministry of Emergency Management in Latest Example of COVID-19 Related Espionage. Retrieved April 28, 2020. ↩

  152. Foltýn, T. (2018, March 13). OceanLotus ships new backdoor using old tricks. Retrieved May 22, 2018. ↩

  153. Kaspersky Lab’s Global Research & Analysis Team. (2018, October 10). MuddyWater expands operations. Retrieved November 2, 2018. ↩

  154. Peretz, A. and Theck, E. (2021, March 5). Earth Vetala – MuddyWater Continues to Target Organizations in the Middle East. Retrieved March 18, 2021. ↩

  155. FireEye iSIGHT Intelligence. (2017, June 16). FIN10: Anatomy of a Cyber Extortion Operation. Retrieved June 25, 2017. ↩

  156. US-CERT. (2018, March 16). Alert (TA18-074A): Russian Government Cyber Activity Targeting Energy and Other Critical Infrastructure Sectors. Retrieved June 6, 2018. ↩

  157. Marczak, B. and Scott-Railton, J.. (2016, May 29). Keep Calm and (Don’t) Enable Macros: A New Threat Actor Targets UAE Dissidents. Retrieved June 8, 2016. ↩

  158. Moran, N., et al. (2014, November 21). Operation Double Tap. Retrieved January 14, 2016. ↩

  159. Novetta Threat Research Group. (2016, February 24). Operation Blockbuster: Unraveling the Long Thread of the Sony Attack. Retrieved February 25, 2016. ↩

  160. Novetta Threat Research Group. (2016, February 24). Operation Blockbuster: Destructive Malware Report. Retrieved March 2, 2016. ↩

  161. Novetta Threat Research Group. (2016, February 24). Operation Blockbuster: Loaders, Installers and Uninstallers Report. Retrieved March 2, 2016. ↩

  162. Novetta Threat Research Group. (2016, February 24). Operation Blockbuster: Remote Administration Tools & Content Staging Malware Report. Retrieved March 16, 2016. ↩

  163. Sherstobitoff, R. (2018, February 12). Lazarus Resurfaces, Targets Global Banks and Bitcoin Users. Retrieved February 19, 2018. ↩

  164. Saini, A. and Hossein, J. (2022, January 27). North Korea’s Lazarus APT leverages Windows Update client, GitHub in latest campaign. Retrieved January 27, 2022. ↩

  165. Falcone, R. and Lee, B.. (2016, May 26). The OilRig Campaign: Attacks on Saudi Arabian Organizations Deliver Helminth Backdoor. Retrieved May 3, 2017. ↩

  166. Grunzweig, J. and Falcone, R.. (2016, October 4). OilRig Malware Campaign Updates Toolset and Expands Targets. Retrieved May 3, 2017. ↩

  167. Cymmetria. (2016). Unveiling Patchwork - The Copy-Paste APT. Retrieved August 3, 2016. ↩

  168. Singh, S. and Antil, S. (2020, October 27). APT-31 Leverages COVID-19 Vaccine Theme and Abuses Legitimate Online Services. Retrieved March 24, 2021. ↩

  169. Hegel, T. (2021, January 13). A Global Perspective of the SideWinder APT. Retrieved January 27, 2021. ↩

  170. DHS/CISA. (2020, August 26). FASTCash 2.0: North Korea’s BeagleBoyz Robbing Banks. Retrieved September 29, 2021. ↩

  171. Scott W. Brady. (2020, October 15). United States vs. Yuriy Sergeyevich Andrienko et al.. Retrieved November 25, 2020. ↩

  172. The BlackBerry Research & Intelligence Team. (2020, October). BAHAMUT: Hack-for-Hire Masters of Phishing, Fake News, and Fake Apps. Retrieved February 8, 2021. ↩

  173. Grunzweig, J., Lee, B. (2016, January 22). New Attacks Linked to C0d0so0 Group. Retrieved August 2, 2018. ↩

  174. Metcalf, S. (2015, September 25). Mimikatz DCSync Usage, Exploitation, and Detection. Retrieved December 4, 2017. ↩

  175. Microsoft. (2017, December 1). MS-DRSR Directory Replication Service (DRS) Remote Protocol. Retrieved December 4, 2017. ↩

  176. Microsoft. (n.d.). IDL_DRSGetNCChanges (Opnum 3). Retrieved December 4, 2017. ↩

  177. Microsoft. (n.d.). MS-SAMR Security Account Manager (SAM) Remote Protocol (Client-to-Server) - Transport. Retrieved December 4, 2017. ↩

  178. SambaWiki. (n.d.). DRSUAPI. Retrieved December 4, 2017. ↩

  179. Schroeder, W. (2015, September 22). Mimikatz and DCSync and ExtraSids, Oh My. Retrieved December 4, 2017. ↩

  180. PowerSploit. (n.d.). Retrieved December 4, 2014. ↩

  181. French, D. (2018, October 2). Detecting Attempts to Steal Passwords from Memory. Retrieved October 11, 2019. ↩

Back to top