T1102.003 One-Way Communication
Adversaries may use an existing, legitimate external Web service as a means for sending commands to a compromised system without receiving return output over the Web service channel. Compromised systems may leverage popular websites and social media to host command and control (C2) instructions. Those infected systems may opt to send the output from those commands back over a different C2 channel, including to another distinct Web service. Alternatively, compromised systems may return no output at all in cases where adversaries want to send instructions to systems and do not want a response.
Popular websites and social media acting as a mechanism for C2 may give a significant amount of cover due to the likelihood that hosts within a network are already communicating with them prior to a compromise. Using common services, such as those offered by Google or Twitter, makes it easier for adversaries to hide in expected noise. Web service providers commonly use SSL/TLS encryption, giving adversaries an added level of protection.
Item | Value |
---|---|
ID | T1102.003 |
Sub-techniques | T1102.001, T1102.002, T1102.003 |
Tactics | TA0011 |
Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS |
Permissions required | User |
Version | 1.0 |
Created | 14 March 2020 |
Last Modified | 26 March 2020 |
Procedure Examples
ID | Name | Description |
---|---|---|
S0568 | EVILNUM | EVILNUM has used a one-way communication method via GitLab and Digital Point to perform C2.6 |
S0037 | HAMMERTOSS | The “tDiscoverer” variant of HAMMERTOSS establishes a C2 channel by downloading resources from Web services like Twitter and GitHub. HAMMERTOSS binaries contain an algorithm that generates a different Twitter handle for the malware to check for instructions every day.7 |
G0065 | Leviathan | Leviathan has received C2 instructions from user profiles created on legitimate websites such as Github and TechNet.8 |
S0455 | Metamorfo | Metamorfo has downloaded a zip file for execution on the system.345 |
S0052 | OnionDuke | OnionDuke uses Twitter as a backup C2.2 |
Mitigations
ID | Mitigation | Description |
---|---|---|
M1031 | Network Intrusion Prevention | Network intrusion detection and prevention systems that use network signatures to identify traffic for specific adversary malware can be used to mitigate activity at the network level. |
M1021 | Restrict Web-Based Content | Web proxies can be used to enforce external network communication policy that prevents use of unauthorized external services. |
Detection
ID | Data Source | Data Component |
---|---|---|
DS0029 | Network Traffic | Network Connection Creation |
References
-
Gardiner, J., Cova, M., Nagaraja, S. (2014, February). Command & Control Understanding, Denying and Detecting. Retrieved April 20, 2016. ↩
-
F-Secure Labs. (2015, September 17). The Dukes: 7 years of Russian cyberespionage. Retrieved December 10, 2015. ↩
-
Erlich, C. (2020, April 3). The Avast Abuser: Metamorfo Banking Malware Hides By Abusing Avast Executable. Retrieved May 26, 2020. ↩
-
Sierra, E., Iglesias, G.. (2018, April 24). Metamorfo Campaigns Targeting Brazilian Users. Retrieved July 30, 2020. ↩
-
Zhang, X. (2020, February 4). Another Metamorfo Variant Targeting Customers of Financial Institutions in More Countries. Retrieved July 30, 2020. ↩
-
Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved December 22, 2021. ↩
-
FireEye Labs. (2015, July). HAMMERTOSS: Stealthy Tactics Define a Russian Cyber Threat Group. Retrieved September 17, 2015. ↩
-
FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018. ↩