T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as Network Sniffing or Transmitted Data Manipulation. By abusing features of common networking protocols that can determine the flow of network traffic (e.g. ARP, DNS, LLMNR, etc.), adversaries may force a device to communicate through an adversary controlled system so they can collect information or perform additional actions.6
For example, adversaries may manipulate victim DNS settings to enable other malicious activities such as preventing/redirecting users from accessing legitimate sites and/or pushing additional malware.814 Adversaries may also manipulate DNS and leverage their position in order to intercept user credentials and session cookies.2 Downgrade Attacks can also be used to establish an AiTM position, such as by negotiating a less secure, deprecated, or weaker version of communication protocol (SSL/TLS) or encryption algorithm.537
Adversaries may also leverage the AiTM position to attempt to monitor and/or modify traffic, such as in Transmitted Data Manipulation. Adversaries can setup a position similar to AiTM to prevent traffic from flowing to the appropriate destination, potentially to Impair Defenses and/or in support of a Network Denial of Service.
Item | Value |
---|---|
ID | T1557 |
Sub-techniques | T1557.001, T1557.002, T1557.003 |
Tactics | TA0006, TA0009 |
Platforms | Linux, Network, Windows, macOS |
Version | 2.2 |
Created | 11 February 2020 |
Last Modified | 30 March 2023 |
Procedure Examples
ID | Name | Description |
---|---|---|
S0281 | Dok | Dok proxies web traffic to potentially monitor and alter victim HTTP(S) traffic.910 |
G0094 | Kimsuky | Kimsuky has used modified versions of PHProxy to examine web traffic between the victim and the accessed website.11 |
Mitigations
ID | Mitigation | Description |
---|---|---|
M1042 | Disable or Remove Feature or Program | Disable legacy network protocols that may be used to intercept network traffic if applicable, especially those that are not needed within an environment. |
M1041 | Encrypt Sensitive Information | Ensure that all wired and/or wireless traffic is encrypted appropriately. Use best practices for authentication protocols, such as Kerberos, and ensure web traffic that may contain credentials is protected by SSL/TLS. |
M1037 | Filter Network Traffic | Use network appliances and host-based security software to block network traffic that is not necessary within the environment, such as legacy protocols that may be leveraged for AiTM conditions. |
M1035 | Limit Access to Resource Over Network | Limit access to network infrastructure and resources that can be used to reshape traffic or otherwise produce AiTM conditions. |
M1031 | Network Intrusion Prevention | Network intrusion detection and prevention systems that can identify traffic patterns indicative of AiTM activity can be used to mitigate activity at the network level. |
M1030 | Network Segmentation | Network segmentation can be used to isolate infrastructure components that do not require broad network access. This may mitigate, or at least alleviate, the scope of AiTM activity. |
M1017 | User Training | Train users to be suspicious about certificate errors. Adversaries may use their own certificates in an attempt to intercept HTTPS traffic. Certificate errors may arise when the application’s certificate does not match the one expected by the host. |
Detection
ID | Data Source | Data Component |
---|---|---|
DS0015 | Application Log | Application Log Content |
DS0029 | Network Traffic | Network Traffic Content |
DS0019 | Service | Service Creation |
DS0024 | Windows Registry | Windows Registry Key Modification |
References
-
Abendan, O. (2012, June 14). How DNS Changer Trojans Direct Users to Threats. Retrieved October 28, 2021. ↩
-
Adair, S., Lancaster, T., Volexity Threat Research. (2022, June 15). DriftingCloud: Zero-Day Sophos Firewall Exploitation and an Insidious Breach. Retrieved July 1, 2022. ↩
-
Alashwali, E. S., Rasmussen, K. (2019, January 26). What’s in a Downgrade? A Taxonomy of Downgrade Attacks in the TLS Protocol and Application Protocols Using TLS. Retrieved December 7, 2021. ↩
-
Kuzmenko, A.. (2021, March 10). Ad blocker with miner included. Retrieved October 28, 2021. ↩
-
praetorian Editorial Team. (2014, August 19). Man-in-the-Middle TLS Protocol Downgrade Attack. Retrieved December 8, 2021. ↩
-
Rapid7. (n.d.). Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attacks. Retrieved March 2, 2020. ↩
-
Team Cinnamon. (2017, February 3). Downgrade Attacks. Retrieved December 9, 2021. ↩
-
Tu, L. Ma, Y. Ye, G. (2020, October 1). Ttint: An IoT Remote Access Trojan spread through 2 0-day vulnerabilities. Retrieved October 28, 2021. ↩
-
Patrick Wardle. (n.d.). Mac Malware of 2017. Retrieved September 21, 2018. ↩
-
Ofer Caspi. (2017, May 4). OSX Malware is Catching Up, and it wants to Read Your HTTPS Traffic. Retrieved October 5, 2021. ↩
-
CISA, FBI, CNMF. (2020, October 27). https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/alerts/aa20-301a. Retrieved November 4, 2020. ↩
-
Microsoft. (2006, August 31). DHCP Server Operational Events. Retrieved March 7, 2022. ↩